General Tax Audit Procedures and Documentation

Assessment Process

1. When does the audit process begin? The audit process commences with the issuance of a Letter of Authority to a taxpayer who has been selected for audit.

2. What is a Letter of Authority? The Letter of Authority is an official document that empowers a Revenue Officer to examine and scrutinize a Taxpayer’s books of accounts and other accounting records, in order to determine the Taxpayer’s correct internal revenue tax liabilities.

3. Who issues the Letter of Authority? Letter of Authority, for audit/investigation of taxpayers under the jurisdiction of National Office, shall be issued and approved by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, while, for taxpayers under the jurisdiction of Regional Offices, it shall be issued by the Regional Director.

4. When must a Letter of Authority be served? A Letter of Authority must be served to the concerned Taxpayer within thirty (30) days from its date of issuance, otherwise, it shall become null and void. The Taxpayer shall then have the right to refuse the service of this LA, unless the LA is revalidated.

5. How often can a Letter of Authority be revalidated? A Letter of Authority is revalidated through the issuance of a new LA. However, a Letter of Authority can be revalidated—

Only once, for LAs issued in the Revenue Regional Offices or the Revenue District Offices; or

Twice, in the case of LAs issued by the National Office.

Any suspended LA(s) must be attached to the new LA issued (RMO 38-88).

6. How much time does a Revenue Officer have to conduct an audit? A Revenue Officer is allowed only one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of receipt of a Letter of Authority by the Taxpayer to conduct the audit and submit the required report of investigation. If the Revenue Officer is unable to submit his final report of investigation within the 120-day period, he must then submit a Progress Report to his Head of Office, and surrender the Letter of Authority for revalidation.

7. How is a particular taxpayer selected for audit? Officers of the Bureau (Revenue District Officers, Chief, Large Taxpayer Assessment Division, Chief, Excise Taxpayer Operations Division, Chief, Policy Cases and Tax Fraud Division) responsible for the conduct of audit/investigation shall prepare a list of all taxpayer who fall within the selection criteria prescribed in a Revenue Memorandum Order issued by the CIR to establish guidelines for the audit program of a particular year. The list of taxpayers shall then be submitted to their respective Assistant Commissioner for pre-approval and to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for final approval. The list submitted by RDO shall be pre-approved by the Regional Director and finally approved by Assistant Commissioner, Assessment Service (RMOs 64-99, 67-99, 18-2000 and 19-2000).

8. How many times can a taxpayer be subjected to examination and inspection for the same taxable year? A taxpayer’s books of accounts shall be subjected to examination and inspection only once for a taxable year, except in the following cases:

When the Commissioner determines that fraud, irregularities, or mistakes were committed by Taxpayer;

When the Taxpayer himself requests a re-investigation or re-examination of his books of accounts;

When there is a need to verify the Taxpayer’s compliance with withholding and other internal revenue taxes as prescribed in a Revenue Memorandum Order issued by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

When the Taxpayer’s capital gains tax liabilities must be verified; and

When the Commissioner chooses to exercise his power to obtain information relative to the examination of other Taxpayers (Secs. 5 and 235, NIRC).

9. What are some of the powers of the Commissioner relative to the audit process? In addition to the authority of the Commissioner to examine and inspect the books of accounts of a Taxpayer who is being audited, the Commissioner may also:

Obtain data and information from private parties other than the Taxpayer himself (Sec.5, NIRC); and

Conduct inventory and surveillance, and prescribe presumptive gross sales and receipts (Sec. 6, NIRC).

10. Within what time period must an assessment be made? An assessment must be made within three (3) years from the last day prescribed by law for the filing of the tax return for the tax that is being subjected to assessment or from the day the return was filed if filed late. However, in cases involving tax fraud, the Bureau has ten (10) years from the date of discovery of such fraud within which to make the assessment.

Any assessments issued after the applicable period are deemed to have prescribed, and can no longer be collected from the Taxpayer, unless the Taxpayer has previously executed a Waiver of Statute of Limitations.

11. What is “Jeopardy Assessment”? A Jeopardy Assessment is a tax assessment made by an authorized Revenue Officer without the benefit of complete or partial audit, in light of the RO’s belief that the assessment and collection of a deficiency tax will be jeopardized by delay caused by the Taxpayer’s failure to:

Comply with audit and investigation requirements to present his books of accounts and/or pertinent records, or

Substantiate all or any of the deductions, exemptions or credits claimed in his return. A jeopardy assessment is illegal.

12. What is a Pre-Assessment Notice (PAN)? The Pre-Assessment Notice is a communication issued by the Regional Assessment Division, or any other concerned BIR Office, informing a Taxpayer who has been audited of the findings of the Revenue Officer, following the review of these findings.

If the Taxpayer disagrees with the findings stated in the PAN, he shall then have fifteen (15) days from his receipt of the PAN to file a written reply contesting the proposed assessment.

13. Under what instances is PAN no longer required? A Preliminary Assessment Notice shall not be required in any of the following cases, in which case, issuance of the formal assessment notice for the payment of the taxpayer’s deficiency tax liability shall be sufficient:

When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in the computation of the tax appearing on the face of the tax return filed by the taxpayer; or

When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the amount actually remitted by the withholding agent; or

When a taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or tax credit of excess creditable withholding tax for a taxable period was determined to have carried over and automatically applied the same amount claimed against the estimated tax liabilities for the taxable quarter or quarters of the succeeding taxable year; or

When the excise tax due on excisable articles has not been paid; or

When an article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person, such as, but not limited to, vehicles, capital equipment, machineries and spare parts, has been sold, traded or transferred to non-exempt persons.

14. What is a Notice of Assessment/Formal Letter of Demand?

A Notice of Assessment is a declaration of deficiency taxes issued to a Taxpayer who fails to respond to a Pre-Assessment Notice within the prescribed period of time, or whose reply to the PAN was found to be without merit. The Notice of Assessment shall inform the Taxpayer of this fact, and that the report of investigation submitted by the Revenue Officer conducting the audit shall be given due course.

The formal letter of demand calling for payment of the taxpayer’s deficiency tax or taxes shall state the facts, the law, rules and regulations, or jurisprudence on which the assessment is based, otherwise, the formal letter of demand and the notice of assessment shall be void.

15. What is required of a taxpayer who is being audited? A Taxpayer who is being audited is obliged to:

Duly acknowledge his receipt of the appropriate Letter of Authority upon its presentation by the Revenue Officer authorized to conduct the audit by affixing in the Letter of Authority the name of the recipient and the date of receipt.

Present within a reasonable period of time, his books of accounts and other related accounting records that may be required by the Revenue Officer; and

Submit the necessary schedules as may be requested by the Revenue Officer within a reasonable amount of time from his (Taxpayer’s) receipt of the Letter of Authority.

16. What is the recourse of a Taxpayer who cannot submit the documents being required of him within the prescribed period of time? If a Taxpayer, believing that he cannot present his books of accounts and/or other accounting records, intends to request for more time to present these documents in order to avoid the issuance of a Jeopardy Assessment, the Taxpayer may execute what is referred to as a Waiver of the Statute of Limitations.

17. What is a Waiver of the Statute of Limitations? The Waiver of the Statute of Limitations is a signed statement whereby the Taxpayer conveys his agreement to extend the period within which the Bureau may validly issue an assessment for deficiency taxes. If a Taxpayer opts to execute a Waiver of the Statute of Limitations, he shall likewise be, in effect, waiving his right to invoke the defense of prescription for assessments issued after the reglementary period.

No Waiver of the Statute of Limitations shall be considered valid unless it is accepted by a duly authorized Bureau official.

18. If a Taxpayer does not agree with the assessment made following an audit, can he protest this Assessment?Yes, he can. A Taxpayer has the right to contest an assessment, and may do so by filing a letter of protest stating in detail his reasons for contesting the assessment.

19. What are the characteristics of a valid protest? A protest is considered valid if it satisfies the following conditions:

It is made in writing, and addressed to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue;

It contains the information, and complies with the conditions required by Sec. 6 of Revenue Regulations No. 12-85; to wit:

a.) Name of the taxpayer and address for the immediate past three (3) taxable year.

b.) Nature of request whether reinvestigation or reconsideration specifying newly discovered evidence he intends to present if it is a request for investigation.

c.) The taxable periods covered.

d.) Assessment number.

e.) Date of receipt of assessment notice or letter of demand.

f.) Itemized statement of the findings to which the taxpayer agrees as a basis for computing the tax due, which amount should be paid immediately upon the filing of the protest. For this purpose, the protest shall not be deemed validly filed unless payment of the agreed portion of the tax is paid first.

g.) The itemized schedule of the adjustments with which the taxpayer does not agree.

h.) A statement of facts and/or law in support of the protest.

The taxpayer shall state the facts, applicable law, rules and regulations or jurisprudence on which his protest is based, otherwise, his protest shall be considered void and without force and effect on the event the letter of protest submitted by the taxpayer is accepted, the taxpayer shall submit the required documents in support of his protest within sixty (60) days from date of filing of his letter of protest, otherwise, the assessment shall become final, executory and demandable.

It is filed within thirty (30) days from the Taxpayer’s receipt of the Notice of Assessment and formal Letter of Demand.

20. In the event the Commissioner’s duly authorized representative denies a Taxpayer’s protest, what alternative course of action is open to the Taxpayer? If a protest filed by a Taxpayer be denied by the Commissioner’s duly authorized representative, the Taxpayer may request the Commissioner for a reconsideration of such denial and that his tax case be referred to the Bureau’s Appellate Division. The Appellate Division serves as a “Court”, where both parties, i.e. the Revenue Officer on one hand, and the Taxpayer on the other, can present testimony and evidence before a Hearing Officer, to support their respective claims.

21. What recourse is open to a Taxpayer if his request for reconsideration is denied or his protest is not acted?

Should the Taxpayer’s request for reconsideration be denied or his protest is not acted upon within 180 days from submission of documents by the Commissioner, the Taxpayer has the right to appeal with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA).

Any appeal must be done within thirty (30) days from the date of the Taxpayer’s receipt of the Commissioner’s decision denying the request for reconsideration or from the lapse of the 180 day period counted from the submission of the documents. (Sec. 228 of the Tax Code, as amended).

22. If the Taxpayer is not satisfied with the CTA’s decision, can he appeal the decision to a higher Court? Yes, he can. Decisions of the Court of Tax Appeals may be appealed with the Court of Appeals within fifteen (15) days from the Taxpayer’s receipt of the CTA’s decision. In the event that the Taxpayer is likewise unsatisfied with the decision of the Court of Appeals, he may appeal this decision with the Supreme Court.

23. Can a Taxpayer claim a refund or tax credit for erroneously or illegally collected taxes? Yes, he can. The Taxpayer may file such a claim with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Sec.229, NIRC), within two (2) years from the payment of the tax or penalty sought to be refunded. Failure of the Taxpayer to file such a claim within this prescribed period shall result in the forfeiture of his right to the refund or tax credit.

24. If a Taxpayer has filed a claim for refund and the Bureau has yet to render a decision on this claim, can the Taxpayer elevate his claim to the CTA?

25. What means are available to the Bureau to compel a Taxpayer to produce his books of accounts and other records? A Taxpayer shall be requested, in writing, not more than two (2) times, to produce his books of accounts and other pertinent accounting records, for inspection. If, after the Taxpayer’s receipt of the second written request, he still fails to comply with the requirements of the notice, the Bureau shall then issue him a Subpoena Duces Tecum.

26. What course of action shall the Bureau take if the Taxpayer fails to comply with the Subpoena Duces Tecum?

If, after the Taxpayer fails, refuses, or neglects to comply with the requirements of the Subpoena Duces Tecum, the Bureau may:

File a criminal case against the Taxpayer for violation of Section 5 as it relates to Sections 14 and 266, of the NIRC, as amended; and/or

Initiate proceedings to cite the Taxpayer for contempt, under Section 3(f), Rule 71 of the Revised Rules of Court.

27. What alternatives are open to Government for the collection of delinquent accounts?

Once an assessment becomes final and demandable, the Government may employ any, or all, of the following remedies for the collection of delinquent accounts:

Distraint of personal property;

Levy of real property belonging to the Taxpayer;

Civil Action; and

Criminal Action.

28. What is “Distraint of Personal Property”? Distraint of personal property involves the seizure by the Government of personal property – tangible or intangible – to enforce the payment of taxes, followed by the public sale of such property, if the Taxpayer fails to pay the taxes voluntarily.

29. What is “Levy of Real Property”? Levy of real property refers to the same act of seizure, but in this case of real property, and interest in or rights to such property in order to enforce the payment of taxes. As in the distraint of personal property, the real property under levy shall be sold in a public sale, if the taxes involved are not voluntarily paid following such levy.

30. In what time period must collection be made? Any internal revenue tax, which has been assessed within the period prescribed shall be collected within three (3) years from date of assessment. However, tax fraud cases may be collected by distraint or levy or by a court proceeding within five (5) years from assessment of the tax or from the last waiver.

 

Advertisements

Robert Kiyosaki: From Rich Dad to Bankrupt Dad?

I first heard about Robert Kiyosaki was when I was in high school. My older brother was raving about it during one of our Sunday family gatherings. He was so amazed with the unorthodox ideas that Mr. Kiyosaki shared in his first book, Rich Dad, Poor Dad. However, being young and carefree back then, it wasn’t until after several years when I was already in law school that I began reading his books. Indeed, in communicating his point of view on why ‘old’ advice – get a job, save money, get out of debt, invest for the long term, and diversify – is ‘bad’ (both obsolete and flawed) advice, Robert has earned a reputation for straight talk, irreverence and courage. So revolutionary were his teachings that when I shared them with my dad, he simply shot them down for being a bunch of nonsense. Of course, now that I am a licensed attorney and financial planner, I realized that Mr. Kiyosaki’s teachings actually made a lot of sense.

Nevertheless, in late A.D. 2012, news began to spread all over social media that Rich Dad® Robert Kiyosaki is now a bankrupt dad because in August of that year, his company, Rich Global LLC, just filed for bankruptcy. So does this really mean that one of the world’s most famous, if not the most famous, personal finance gurus, the one who was allegedly mentored by his best friend’s rich dad several decades ago as a child, failed and became poor all of a sudden? Before we get to that, let me first give you an idea on what filing for corporate bankruptcy really means.

Title 11, of the United States Code, a.k.a. the United States Bankruptcy Code, is the main source of bankruptcy law in the United States. Chapter 7 thereof governs the process of liquidation and is the most popular and common form of bankruptcy. When a troubled business is badly in debt and unable to service that debt or pay its creditors, it may file for bankruptcy in a federal court under Chapter 7. A Chapter 7 filing means that the business ceases operations unless continued by the Chapter 7 trustee. A trustee is appointed almost immediately, with broad powers to examine the business’s financial affairs. The trustee generally liquidates all the assets and distributes the proceeds to the creditors. In a Chapter 7 case, a corporation or partnership does not receive a bankruptcy discharge—instead, the entity is dissolved. Only an individual can receive a discharge. Once all assets of the corporate or partnership debtor have been fully administered, the case is closed.

Here in the Philippines, our laws refer to bankruptcy proceedings as ‘insolvency’ proceedings. In fact, just five years ago, the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act of 2010 or FRIA was passed. The new law provides for the substantive and procedural requirements for the rehabilitation or liquidation of financially distressed enterprises and individuals. The FRIA defines “insolvent” as the “financial condition of a debtor that is generally unable to pay its or its liabilities as they fall due in the ordinary course of business or has liabilities that are greater than its or his assets.” Now you may ask, why would a very rich man like Robert Kiyosaki allow the company he built to go bankrupt or insolvent?

It was reported that the founder of Learning Annex, Bill Zanker, sued Rich Global for $24 million. Learning Annex was one of his supporters when he was still starting as a businessman. Actually, Robert Kiyosaki owns many businesses and Rich Global LLC is just one of those corporations. Robert now runs most of his businesses under his other company, Rich Dad Co. In fact, Rich Dad Co. CEO Mike Sullivan informed the New York Post in an interview that Robert Kiyosaki would not be putting any of his personal fortune toward the settlement. Now, that is the beauty of using a corporate entity as a vehicle for one’s business. It provides a layer of protection against asset raiders such as legal plaintiffs. You see, when a company files for bankruptcy or insolvency, its creditors, including its judgment creditors, cannot just simply collect from the company nor seize it assets legally without first complying with the requirements of the law. That is why Robert Kiyosaki is still quite rich even after filing for bankruptcy with an estimated net worth of $80 million. Having his company Rich Global LLC file for bankruptcy was merely a legal strategy in order to protect his personal assets.

Instead of losing his credibility as a personal finance coach and wealth advisor, such a bold move by Robert Kiyosaki just proves that he is indeed financially intelligent. So much so that he is certainly more financially intelligent than most people, especially those who immediately jumped the gun in judgment against him upon reading the news headlines about his company filing for bankruptcy. Although I have my differences with some of his theories, I along with my colleagues in the financial services industry consider his books as indispensable reading in personal finance and entrepreneurship. It is truly undeniable that all of us, in one way or another, were illuminated and inspired by his teachings.

I am so excited about his upcoming event, Robert Kiyosaki Live in Manila: Masters of Wealth, which will be held on November 30, 2015 at the SMX, Mall of Asia. It’s a once in a lifetime opportunity to learn not only from the master himself but also from other world class wealth coaches, economists, businessmen and educators. I believe that to be financially successful, the first asset that we should invest in is ourselves.

Kiyosaki Live

Financial Accounting vs. Tax Accounting

“Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” (Luke 20:25, ESV)

Although roughly only 10% of taxpayers are audited annually, professionals and business owners are in constant fear of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), especially with the spunky Commissioner Kim Jacinto-Henares at its helm. In speaking and interacting with several accountants in a business setting, I have heard them say again and again that no matter how well they prepare a client’s financial statements, the BIR can and will always find a deficiency somewhere. To be sure, this is not only true for small and medium accounting and auditing firms but with big ones as well.

Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) use financial accounting principles or what is more commonly known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). In the Philippines, we have adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as our Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS). The problem arises when these audited financial statements (AFS) are submitted to the BIR as attachment to company or individual Income Tax Returns (ITR) for purposes of computing the tax liability. This is due to the fact that the BIR does not use the same accounting principles and standards used in financial accounting but rather that which is provided for by law under the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (NIRC) or Tax Code for short, along with revenue issuances by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, such as Revenue Regulations (RR), Revenue Memorandum Orders (RMO), and Revenue Audit Memorandum Orders (RAMO), among others.

RR No. 8-2007 provides that “the recording and recognition of business transactions for financial accounting purposes, in a majority of situations, differ from the application of tax rules on the same transactions resulting to disparity of reports for financial accounting vis-à-vis tax accounting.” Moreover, RMC No. 22-2004 states that “It has been observed that the GAAP and GAAS approved and adopted may from time to time be different from the provisions of the Tax Code.” It then provides that “All returns required to be filed by the Tax Code shall be prepared always in conformity with the provisions of the Tax Code. Taxability of income and deductibility of expenses shall be determined strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Tax Code and the rules and regulations issued implementing the said Tax Code. In case of difference between the provisions of the Tax Code and the rules and regulations implementing the Tax Code, on one hand, and the GAAP and GAAS, on the other hand, the provisions of the Tax Code and the rules and regulations issued implementing the Tax Code shall prevail.” In a separate ruling, the BIR held that “Therefore, it is the financial statements which is in conformity with the Tax Code that should be attached in the filing of Income Tax Returns” (BIR Ruling No. M-111-2006).

This is the main reason why the BIR always finds alleged deficiencies in a taxpayer’s tax return and payment. But what if you have already been using financial accounting principles for the longest time in filing your ITR? Don’t worry, all hope is not lost. RR No. 8-2007 further provides that “Hence, there is a need to reconcile the disparity in a systematic and clear manner to avoid irritants between the taxpayer and the tax enforcer. Accordingly, concerned taxpayers are hereby mandated to maintain books and records that would reflect the reconciling items between Financial Statements figures and/or data with those reflected/presented in the filed Income Tax Return (ITR). The recording and presentation of the reconciling items in such books and records shall be done in such a manner that would facilitate the understanding by the examiners/auditors of the Bureau of Internal Revenue tasked to undertake audit/investigation functions, providing in sufficient detail the computation of the differences and the reasons therefore aimed at bringing into agreement the IFRS and ITR figures.”

Surely, such reconciling of records is indeed taxing (pun intended)! So, in order to avoid such a predicament and the headaches that come along with it, it would be better for taxpayers to adopt tax accounting methods and principles as the PFRS from the very beginning instead of the IFRS as their GAAP and GAAS. For more information on tax accounting principles and methods, please refer to RR V-1 for the Bookkeeping Regulations and RAMO 1-2000, which serves as the guidebook of BIR auditors and examiners in implementing the provisions of the Tax Code, or consult a competent tax professional.

Effects of the Different Property Regimes in the Computation of the Estate Tax Due

Someone asked: “Atty. Terence, I just wanted to ask, what if there was a prenup agreement? How do you divide the properties and compute the estate tax due? Will a prenup supersede the law of a community property with regard to estate tax?”

——————————————————————————————————————

Answer: A prenuptial agreement, otherwise known legally as a marriage settlement, is a contract entered into by the parties intending to get married, which must be executed by them prior to the wedding, otherwise, the same shall be void. The primary purpose of a marriage settlement is to determine the property regime of the parties to the future marriage other than that provided for by law by default.

Estate tax, also known as inheritance tax, is a tax on the right of a deceased person to transmit his estate to his lawful heirs and beneficiaries. Contrary to popular belief, it is not a tax on property but on the right to transmit property at death, and is measured by the value of the property.

Now that we know what estate tax is, we should then consider the different kinds of property regimes that a married couple can enter into in order for us to properly compute the value of their respective gross estates and ultimately, their net taxable estates.

For marriages celebrated after or on the effectivity date of the Family Code, which is on August 3, 1988, in the absence of a valid marriage settlement, the default property regime of absolute community of property (ACP) shall govern. In a regime of ACP, the community property shall consist of all the property owned by the spouses at the time of the celebration of the marriage or acquired thereafter. However, the following are excluded therefrom: (1) Property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title by either spouse, and the fruits as well as the income thereof, if any, unless it is expressly provided by the donor, testator or grantor that they shall form part of the community property; (2) Property for personal and exclusive use of either spouse; however, jewelry shall form part of the community property; and (3) Property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage, and the fruits as well as the income, if any, of such property.

On the other hand, for marriages celebrated before the effectivity of the Family Code, the default property regime of conjugal partnership of gains (CPG) provided for under the Civil Code, the effectivity of which began on August 30, 1950, shall prevail. The same is true in case the future spouses agree in the marriage settlements that the regime of conjugal partnership of gains shall govern their property relations during the marriage. In a regime of CPG, the husband and wife place in a common fund  the proceeds, products, fruits and income from their separate properties and those acquired by either or both spouses through their efforts or by chance, and, upon dissolution of the marriage of the partnership, the net gains or benefits obtained by either of both spouses shall be divided equally between them, unless otherwise agreed in the marriage settlements. Hence, the following shall be the exclusive property of each spouse: (1) That which is brought to the marriage as his or her own; (2) That which each acquires during the marriage by gratuitous title; (3) That which is acquired by right of redemption, by barter or exchange with property belonging to only one of the spouses; and (4) That which is purchased with exclusive money of the wife or of the husband.

Lastly, in a regime of complete separation of property (CSP), each spouse retains ownership of his or her own properties including the fruits thereof. In short, what’s yours is yours and what’s mine is mine. Article 134 of the Family Code provides that in the absence of an express declaration in the marriage settlements, the separation of property between spouses during the marriage shall not take place except by judicial order. Such judicial separation of property may either be voluntary or for sufficient cause.

So, after determining the share of each spouse from the mass of the community or conjugal property, we can now compute for their respective individual gross estates. Section 85 of the National Internal Revenue Code provides that “the value of the gross estate of the decedent shall be determined by including the value at the time of his death of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated; Provided however, that in the case of the non-resident decedent who at the time of his death was not a citizen of the Philippines only that part of the entire gross estate which is situated in the Philippines shall be included in his taxable estate.”

Having determined their respective individual gross estates, we can now proceed to computing their net taxable estates taking into consideration the applicable exclusions and deductions provided for by law.